
|
January 2009 Commentary It The financial crisis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
... that quaint period, the thirties,
when the huge middle class of Have we learned the lessons of the Great Depression now? We are once again, in Tennessee Williams’ memorable image,
having our “fingers pressed forcibly down on the fiery Braille alphabet of a
dissolving economy.” And the reason is that many of us have, once again,
“failed our eyes.” The lessons taught to the socially and economically
sight-impaired in the 1930s have been forgotten or willfully denied, producing conditions in the present decade very
much like those in the 1920s that led to the Great Depression. In the ’20s,
as in recent years, tax cuts for the rich, in combination with anti-union
practices and a lack of regulation of markets, yielded increasing wealth
inequality. The extreme gap between rich and poor meant that more money went
into speculation (by the rich) rather than consumption (by everyone);
consumption is what keeps the economy healthy. Mass consumption and the
economy were propped up, but only temporarily, with an unsustainable amount
of consumer credit—until the speculation bubble burst and the credit ran out
in 1929. Who most completely failed their eyes? Who are those responsible
for creating the conditions that led to the economic meltdown that began in
September? Fundamentalists. Not religious fundamentalists, but the other side of the
conservative coalition that has been an uneasy alliance inside the Republican
Party in recent decades: economic fundamentalists. These worshippers place
blind faith in the false god of the market, assuming that whatever market
forces do must be accepted. This misplaced belief holds that governmental
checks and balances—which are in fact necessary to counter the bad that
inevitably comes with the good of capitalism—are evil, and that the very rich
should be allowed to accumulate as much as they can. THE ECONOMIC collapse of 1929 and ensuing Great Depression
discredited faith in an omnipotent and beneficent market god for several
decades. However, since about 1980, true believers in that false creed have
been born again, and economic fundamentalists have been singing “Give Me That
Old Time Economic Religion.” For example, Amity Shlaes, in her 2007
social-Darwinist tract The Forgotten Man, argued that Calvin Coolidge
was right and Franklin Roosevelt was somehow responsible for the Depression. She and other evangelists found people on Wall Street and It is high time for economic sanity to return. “Spreading the
wealth around” is both better morality and better economics than is
concentrating it at the top. Jesus is not only a better moralist than are the
economic fundamentalists, he is also a better
economist. His teachings should have a seat at the table when President Obama’s economic advisers develop plans for getting us
out of the mess that the econ-fundamentalists got us into. Those plans must
include economic stimulus, but great care must be taken to ensure that the
benefits are widely distributed and are not just a bailout for bankers and
rich speculators. The new administration should move toward restoring the
traditional value that morality should be part of our economic calculus. That
means adopting policies that fight inequality—policies including universal
health care, progressive taxation, a fair climate for unions, and sensible
regulation. Historian Robert S. McElvaine teaches at |